GUIDELINE 7: Establish coordination agreements in advance to leverage strengths and foster trust

Print the Guideline I Print the Guideline and Practices 

States, private sector actors, international organizations, and civil society often work with fewer resources than required. Each of these stakeholders has unique skills, resources, and strengths. Working together to build partnerships, entering into agreements, and establishing routine coordination improves collective responses towards migrants, and prevents duplication of efforts. Such arrangements are best entered into before the next conflict or natural disaster, when stakeholders have the opportunity to anticipate challenges and leverage unique skills and strengths. Joint planning and coordination maximizes resources, improves the effectiveness of responses, and fosters trust between stakeholders. Involving migrants and civil society, who have first-hand knowledge of the specific needs and challenges faced by migrants, can improve the effectiveness of efforts to protect migrants in countries experiencing crises, including at the local, national, regional, or international levels.

These arrangements may relate to a range of activities relevant to the needs of migrants during the emergency phase and its aftermath—from collection of data to information sharing, consular services to identity assessments, awareness-raising to strategic communication plans, provision of humanitarian relief and services to referral systems, capacity-building to evacuation and reintegration assistance, and much more. This may include coordination and information sharing among anti-trafficking experts and humanitarian assistance providers to ensure screening for trafficking and referral to appropriate services. Additionally, by developing systems to identify refugees, asylum-seekers, and stateless persons, States can better ensure that these persons are appropriately referred to the available refugee and other protection mechanisms.

Stakeholders can often arrange in advance key services and resources that will be in high demand when a crisis hits, including transportation, shelter, food, health care, and timely and accurate information. Establishing and maintaining clear channels of communication between consular posts and relevant agencies of the host State is important. Such channels of communication could prove critical during crisis situations.

Sample Practices

  • Pre-arranged agreements among stakeholders, such as agreements between States and international organizations for identity verification, shared use of assets, family tracing, and deployment of experts and humanitarian personnel.
  • Multi-stakeholder agreements for relocation and evacuation that set out roles and responsibilities of partners and provide guidance on allocation of costs.
  • Cross-border cooperation on crisis preparedness, taking into account particular needs of migrants, especially at a local level for communities that straddle borders.
  • Reciprocal consular assistance and representation agreements to address gaps in situations where States do not have a diplomatic or consular presence in a country or have limited capacity.
Country:
Global
Type of Practice:
Tools

The International Organization for Migration (IOM)’s Migration Crisis Operational Framework (MCOF) is a practical, operational and institution-wide tool to improve and systematize the way in which the Organization supports its Member States and partners to better prepare for and respond to...

Country:
Benin, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Honduras, Indonesia, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Morocco, Nepal, Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Thailand, Zimbabwe
Type of Practice:
International programs

The IFRC has engaged in a 45-month project, co-funded by the European Union (EU) and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) to promote the rights of migrants in targeted countries, migration corridors and regions through a globally coordinated civil society...

Country:
Angola
Type of Practice:
Government bodies

The Institute Providing Support to Angolan Communities Abroad (IAECAE) was established in 1992 in the Angolan Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MIREX).

Country:
United Kingdom
Type of Practice:
Awareness raising and communication tools

The Travel Aware campaign is a joint venture between the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the travel industry to help make sure British travelers are better prepared when they go overseas.

Country:
Australia
Type of Practice:
Training and capacity building

A conference was organized on 17th October 2009 by the Australian Capital Territory (ACT)’s Jurisdictional Community Partnership project, as component of Attorney General Department’s Inclusive Emergency Management with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Communities Program.

Country:
Australia
Type of Practice:
Tests and simulations

Exercise “Stuffed Goose” is a multi-agency exercise involving State Government departments and agencies, including the Country Fire Service (CFS), South Australia (SA) Police, State Emergency Service (SES), Metropolitan Fire Service SA, Local Government, and community volunteers.

Country:
El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico
Type of Practice:
Agreements

The consulates of Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras launched the initiative “TRICAMEX” in the city of McAllen, in the United States of America.

Country:
United States of America
Type of Practice:
Government Bodies

The Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) was created in 1985 under the Federal Advisory Committee Act to promote security cooperation between American private sector interests worldwide and the U.S. Department of State.

Country:
Japan
Type of Practice:
Assistance programs

The Great East Japan Earthquake affected foreign nationals in the areas hit by the disaster. Elements of the Japan’s Ministry of Foreign affairs response, implemented in cooperation with IOM, included:

Country:
United States of America
Type of Practice:
Assistance programs

Community-based organizations funded by the New York Women Fund (NYWF) were “first responders,” to respond in far-reaching neighborhoods and isolated, hard-to-reach populations during the superstorm Sandy.