Egyptian Evacuation Operation from Lebanon (2006)

Type of practice: Assistance programs

Country: Egypt, Lebanon

Name of Stakeholder: Government of Egypt

Type of Stakeholder Implementing the Practice: State of Origin

Description

At the time of the the Israel-Lebanon conflict in 2006, the Egyptian government estimated the number of Egyptian nationals working and living in Lebanon at around 300,000. The Egyptian embassies in Beirut and Damascus established a hotline and a “crises-management group”. Although only 5,000 were registered, the two embassies coordinated the evacuation of around 14,000 back to Egypt. With routes agreed to by the Israelis, the Foreign Ministry sent many military aircraft on an almost daily basis, using an old disused runway that had not been damaged. These brought aid, including medicines (they established a temporary hospital in the south) as well as milk, rice and oil and returned to Egypt with both Egyptian and Lebanese evacuees. Navy frigates also shipped many tons of drinking water from Alexandria. Between 3,000 and 4,000 Egyptians avoided the $1000 fine for Lebanese immigration law violations, thanks to their embassy’s negotiations.

Related links: Migrant Evacuations during Lebanon Crisis, Ray Jureidini

Guidelines/Thematic Areas

Provision of humanitarian assistance

GUIDELINE 11: Provide humanitarian assistance to migrants without discrimination

In the collective effort to protect migrants caught in countries experiencing conflicts or natural disasters, there is no greater imperative than to save lives and alleviate suffering. Humanitarian assistance should be provided to people affected by a conflict or a natural disaster, including migrants, on the basis of need, without discrimination, and regardless of immigration status, nationality, ethnicity, gender, age, disability, or other differentiating characteristics.

Some migrants, just as with affected citizens, may need assistance to address their particular needs and circumstances. Domestic workers and others working in isolated conditions, migrants in an irregular immigration status, and migrants in detention may require specific assistance from States, international organizations, and civil society. Some migrants may be unwilling to leave host States due to incapacitating financial burdens; they may owe money to recruiters or employers. Others may lack access to the necessary financial resources to leave, because their wages are withheld, their employers are unable or unwilling to pay for their return, or they work in exploitative situations. Pregnant women, persons with disabilities, and the elderly may face mobility challenges.

Migrants’ needs will not remain static during the shifting dynamics of a crisis. Organized criminal networks may take advantage of marginalized migrants in a crisis, exacerbating their vulnerability. A change in circumstances in a migrant’s State of origin may compel some people to seek asylum rather than return. Stakeholders should ensure access to asylum procedures in the host State or States of transit. States may consider providing migrants temporary and other forms of humanitarian protection during or in response to a conflict or natural disaster.

Sample Practices

• Displacement tracking mechanisms to identify migrant movements and needs.
• Tailored assistance to migrants that take into account needs that may arise from gender, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, immigration status, or other characteristics.
• Assessment tools to determine migrant-specific vulnerability and needs, including specialized screening for indicators of human trafficking.
• Targeted action to protect migrant children, including unaccompanied and separated children, and children with parents in an irregular immigration status.
• Services to trace and reunify family members and identify remains and missing migrants.
• Mobile response teams to reach and provide assistance to affected migrants.
• Separation of immigration enforcement from access to humanitarian services to promote access to life-saving assistance especially for migrants who fear authorities.
• Mechanisms to recover outstanding wages.

Relocation and evacuation

GUIDELINE 13: Relocate and evacuate migrants when needed

During some crises, stakeholders may be able to protect migrants where they are located in the host State. But this may not always be possible, especially in situations where the repercussions of a conflict or natural disaster envelop large geographic areas. Where protection cannot be provided locally, it may be necessary to relocate migrants to other parts of the host State or evacuate them to States of transit or the State of origin. Some migrants may make these journeys on their own. Many may rely on States, their employers, recruiters, or placement agencies, international organizations, civil society, and other migrants for support and assistance.

Evacuation is generally a last resort but absolutely essential if migrants cannot remain safely where they are and cannot be relocated safely to another part of the host State. Where comprehensive contingency plans and standing evacuation and relocation arrangements are not already in place, ad hoc arrangements may be needed to communicate evacuation information, determine eligibility for evacuation, establish modes of evacuation, and negotiate with States of transit and other actors. States, regardless of whether they are party to relevant international instruments, should implement specific safeguards to ensure individuals who face persecution, or, as appropriate, serious harm or other life-threatening situations in their States of origin or other States, including refugees, are protected against refoulement. Stateless persons may need specific assistance to take advantage of evacuation arrangements. Coordination between States and other stakeholders in carrying out evacuations can leverage resources, for example, to transport migrants to States of origin in the same region.

Sample Practices

• Evacuation of migrants to States of transit or States of origin with their informed consent.
• Establishment of criteria for eligibility for evacuation.
• Multi-stakeholder cooperation on evacuation.
• Evacuation for family units who have family members of different nationalities.
• Deploying personnel to consular posts to assist with evacuation.